Lighting patterns on the Moon are in some sense a cosmic sundial, with each position of the Sun producing a definite pattern. Ordering a series of photos according to the sun angle should establish where other photos fall in the sequence. Unfortunately the photo times reported on the internet are not always reliable, and the way the photos are processed can affect the appearance of the terminator. In particular, points of light beyond the terminator are frequently lost to underexposure.
This page shows the changing appearance of Sinus Iridum, and the surrounding hills, as a function sun angle. The appearance of Montes Jura (the hills surrounding Sinus Iridum) as they emerge out of the darkness beyond the terminator at local lunar sunrise has sometimes been informally called the "Golden Handle". It has even been said to be so prominent an effect that it can be seen by some sharp-eyed observers without optical aid. However that may be, it happens every month and can be observed through a suitably placed telescope on Earth. This page should establish the range of sun angles over which the hills around Sinus Iridum have a "handle" like appearance. For a particular observer on Earth to observe this effect, the Moon has to be above the local horizon, and the Sun below it, when this range of sun angles is occurring.
LTVT has been used to remap each of many observation to a uniform zero libration Earth-based view. A few of the photos look slightly out of sequence -- possibly due to differences of exposure or misreporting of the times -- but the general trend of emerging peaks as the Sun rises seems fairly clear.
(Click on the thumbnails below to see full-sized LTVT screenshots. In each section, the screenshots are at an identical scale and registered. To superimpose or blink between them, open them in separate browser windows or tabs. In LTVT itself, this is accomplished by running several instances of LTVT simultaneously, with one photo being displayed in each.)
George Tarsoudis Images
The original inspiration for preparing the sunrise sequence was two images by George Tarsoudis.
Although the day and minute at which they were taken was thought to have been accurately recorded, there was some question about the hour. Such questions arise because it is possible for computer systems to unwittingly change the hour. For example, in most modern versions of the Windows operating system, the computer's clock is kept synchronized to Universal Time via the internet connection. Disk files are stamped with the Universal Time at which they were recorded or modified, but for the "convenience" of the operator, those times are displayed corrected to the local time zone, including an offset for daylight savings ("summer time") during certain months of the year. This offset is applied to all universal times regardless of where the computer was located and whether daylight savings was in effect at the time the file was stamped. As a result, the clock display looks like a local time, but it may not be the same as what a local clock would have read at the time the file was recorded. This can make it very difficult for operators to determine the offset needed to correct a particular display back to the universal time normally used for reporting astronomical observations. In Windows systems, this particular problem can be solved by using the "Date and Time Properties" dialog box to temporarily select "GMT (Casablanca, Monrovia)". This will display the time stamps in Universal Time (with no correction). However problems can still arise if files are recorded on, or transferred to and from, external media like portable drives, flash drives, and CD-ROMs. Such devices sometimes stamp files in local time, which can then be misinterpreted as a Universal Time when they are transferred to a hard drive.
Whatever the reason, the question was where these two photos fit in the sunrise sequence. The sun angle increases by about 0.35° for each 1 hour change.
George's images are shown here:
2008 May 15
2008 Jan 18
Sunrise Sequence at 10X
Like George's images shown above, all the following images have been remapped to zero libration views with an LTVT Zoom of 10. The numbers above each thumbnail are the sun angles calculated at 31.5°W/ 44.1°N (the IAU center of Sinus Iridum, which is also at the center of each screenshot) based on the stated time of the photo.
0.42 @ 89.6°
0.85 @ 90.8°
0.90 @ 91.8°
0.98 @ 92.9°
1.25 @ 91.2°
1.96 @ 93.3°
2.20 @ 93.0°
2.51 @ 94.6°
2.54 @ 90.7°
2.67 @ 90.4°
3.15 @ 95.1°
3.19 @ 91.6°
3.74 @ 95.7°
4.45 @ 92.6°
4.98 @ 96.0°
5.73 @ 97.6°
6.04 @ 98.0°
7.27 @ 98.0°
7.48 @ 99.3°
7.84 @ 99.8°
7.86 @ 99.8°
8.16 @ 97.1°
8.91 @ 96.5°
9.58 @ 99.4°
10.15 @ 101.9°
12.93 @ 103.1°
14.63 @ 105.2°
22.30 @ 113.8°
29.35 @ 125.8°
31.92 @ 130.3°
34.90 @ 134.6°
44.68 @ 195.0°
Images Displayed
The following table gives the observational details of the images used. The altitude (above the horizontal) and azimuth (measured clockwise from lunar north) of the Sun have been computed as they would be seen by an observer at the IAU center of Sinus Iridum (selenographic longitude/latitude 31.5°W/ 44.1°N). This is not a perfect measure of the lighting at every point, but it should be a pretty good one. For a particular solar altitude, peaks in the northern part of the Montes Jura will be slightly favored (brighter than normal) when the Sun's azimuth has a low value (sunrise terminator twisted counterclockwise), while those in the southern part will be slightly favored under the opposite circumstances.
These two files can be used with the LTVT Image Grabber to retrieve copies from the internet. Calibration and source information for the Consolidated Lunar Atlas plates are available elsewhere on this site.
This page has been edited 5 times. The last modification was made by - JimMosher on Feb 22, 2009 1:53 pm
Sinus Iridum
Table of Contents
Description
Lighting patterns on the Moon are in some sense a cosmic sundial, with each position of the Sun producing a definite pattern. Ordering a series of photos according to the sun angle should establish where other photos fall in the sequence. Unfortunately the photo times reported on the internet are not always reliable, and the way the photos are processed can affect the appearance of the terminator. In particular, points of light beyond the terminator are frequently lost to underexposure.
This page shows the changing appearance of Sinus Iridum, and the surrounding hills, as a function sun angle. The appearance of Montes Jura (the hills surrounding Sinus Iridum) as they emerge out of the darkness beyond the terminator at local lunar sunrise has sometimes been informally called the "Golden Handle". It has even been said to be so prominent an effect that it can be seen by some sharp-eyed observers without optical aid. However that may be, it happens every month and can be observed through a suitably placed telescope on Earth. This page should establish the range of sun angles over which the hills around Sinus Iridum have a "handle" like appearance. For a particular observer on Earth to observe this effect, the Moon has to be above the local horizon, and the Sun below it, when this range of sun angles is occurring.
LTVT has been used to remap each of many observation to a uniform zero libration Earth-based view. A few of the photos look slightly out of sequence -- possibly due to differences of exposure or misreporting of the times -- but the general trend of emerging peaks as the Sun rises seems fairly clear.
(Click on the thumbnails below to see full-sized LTVT screenshots. In each section, the screenshots are at an identical scale and registered. To superimpose or blink between them, open them in separate browser windows or tabs. In LTVT itself, this is accomplished by running several instances of LTVT simultaneously, with one photo being displayed in each.)
George Tarsoudis Images
The original inspiration for preparing the sunrise sequence was two images by George Tarsoudis.
Although the day and minute at which they were taken was thought to have been accurately recorded, there was some question about the hour. Such questions arise because it is possible for computer systems to unwittingly change the hour. For example, in most modern versions of the Windows operating system, the computer's clock is kept synchronized to Universal Time via the internet connection. Disk files are stamped with the Universal Time at which they were recorded or modified, but for the "convenience" of the operator, those times are displayed corrected to the local time zone, including an offset for daylight savings ("summer time") during certain months of the year. This offset is applied to all universal times regardless of where the computer was located and whether daylight savings was in effect at the time the file was stamped. As a result, the clock display looks like a local time, but it may not be the same as what a local clock would have read at the time the file was recorded. This can make it very difficult for operators to determine the offset needed to correct a particular display back to the universal time normally used for reporting astronomical observations. In Windows systems, this particular problem can be solved by using the "Date and Time Properties" dialog box to temporarily select "GMT (Casablanca, Monrovia)". This will display the time stamps in Universal Time (with no correction). However problems can still arise if files are recorded on, or transferred to and from, external media like portable drives, flash drives, and CD-ROMs. Such devices sometimes stamp files in local time, which can then be misinterpreted as a Universal Time when they are transferred to a hard drive.
Whatever the reason, the question was where these two photos fit in the sunrise sequence. The sun angle increases by about 0.35° for each 1 hour change.
George's images are shown here:
Sunrise Sequence at 10X
Like George's images shown above, all the following images have been remapped to zero libration views with an LTVT Zoom of 10. The numbers above each thumbnail are the sun angles calculated at 31.5°W/ 44.1°N (the IAU center of Sinus Iridum, which is also at the center of each screenshot) based on the stated time of the photo.
Images Displayed
The following table gives the observational details of the images used. The altitude (above the horizontal) and azimuth (measured clockwise from lunar north) of the Sun have been computed as they would be seen by an observer at the IAU center of Sinus Iridum (selenographic longitude/latitude 31.5°W/ 44.1°N). This is not a perfect measure of the lighting at every point, but it should be a pretty good one. For a particular solar altitude, peaks in the northern part of the Montes Jura will be slightly favored (brighter than normal) when the Sun's azimuth has a low value (sunrise terminator twisted counterclockwise), while those in the southern part will be slightly favored under the opposite circumstances.
Here is a URL list for the amateur images:
And here are LTVT calibrations for them:
These two files can be used with the LTVT Image Grabber to retrieve copies from the internet. Calibration and source information for the Consolidated Lunar Atlas plates are available elsewhere on this site.
This page has been edited 5 times. The last modification was made by -